Sportsmen’s Groups Fight for Hunter Access

By Justin McDaniel Published: 7/29/2011

Wilderness_Study_Area_Terry_Badlands_Big.jpgA coalition of sportsmen’s groups, including NRA, Safari Club International (SCI) and the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance, is supporting a bill in Congress to release millions of acres of public lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from continued management as de facto wilderness areas. 

Currently, approximately 43 million acres of Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs) and Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) across the United States are being managed as wilderness areas, even though the Forest Service and BLM have stated that many of these areas are not suitable for wilderness designation. 

However, because of current law, both IRAs and WSAs, even those not suitable for wilderness, must be managed in a restrictive fashion just like formal Wilderness Areas designated by Congress. These restrictions limit motorized access, impede many forest management practices, and hinder the public’s ability to access and enjoy these lands.

H.R. 1581, the “Wilderness and Roadless Area Release Act of 2011,” has been introduced to implement the recommendations of the Forest Service and BLM and lift the restrictive management practices on these specific 43 million acres of WSAs and IRAs. Lifting the restrictions would return these lands to multiple-use management, thus allowing hunters and other users to better access these areas through roads and trails that are already in place.

“This legislation is long overdue,” said Susan Recce, NRA Director of Conservation, Wildlife and Natural Resources. “Millions of acres of public land that do not meet the definition of wilderness remain locked away from all but the most physically fit hunters. These non-wilderness lands will continue to be governed by the most restrictive management rules until such time as Congress releases them back to multiple-use management. H.R. 1581 rectifies this problem.”

On Tuesday, Melissa Simpson, SCI Director of Hunter Advocacy, provided testimony on H.R. 1581 on behalf of the coalition before the House Committee on Natural Resource’s subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.

“H.R. 1581 would help hunters who are being denied or limited access to public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service,” Simpson said. “Currently, the Bureau and Forest Service are managing nearly 43 million acres of public land under the prohibitions of wilderness area study area policy, even though the agencies have recommended to Congress that these areas are not suitable for wilderness designation.”

The Forest Service has identified 36 million acres of IRAs that are not suitable for wilderness designation but are being managed as such. Idaho alone has 9.3 million acres of IRAs. The BLM manages more than 12 million acres of WSAs but has recommended that 6.7 million of these acres not be managed as wilderness. States with WSAs include New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Alaska.

The protectionist management by the two agencies severely restricts hunter access by 1.) Failing to authorize roads and trails that would help disabled and elderly hunters’ access hunting areas; 2.) Prohibiting or limiting hunters from using carts for game retrieval and; 3.) Making areas virtually inaccessible due to the closure of existing roads and trails.

Studies have shown that a lack of access to hunting lands is one of the biggest reasons why people stop hunting.

Allowing these lands to be managed for multiple uses opens them up to healthy forest management, better access for firefighting capabilities, and numerous recreational activities, including increased hunting and fishing—all of which represent an economic benefit for local economies.

“We applaud Congress for taking the necessary steps forward to follow the agencies’ recommendations and put these lands into multiple-use,” said Simpson. “Unlike the current ‘one-size-fits-all' management of these lands, H.R. 1581 will allow for local communities to determine what multiple-use management is most appropriate and improve access for sportsmen.”

Related Articles
Comments
I must agree that the NRA has it wrong on this one. The problem is not lack of access but lack of quality, undisturbed habitat without hoards of people and spooked game. The opportunity for a genuine wilderness experience that is open to hunting is what needs to be protected, not the ability to just wheel in on an ATV to the most remote location. The best way to conserve these areas is to leave them to those willing to walk further than the masses and pay their dues to carry out their game. I urge you to reconsider this stance before you lose the support of genuine conservation minded sportsmen. This anti-environmental stance is one of the main reasons why I gave up my NRA membership.

From Neil H on Sunday, October 23, 2011 9:31 AM
This seems to be an example of insider politics, not looking out for hunters rights and opportunities. I'm not sure if the NRA understands that the best hunting opportunities for the common man on backcountry public lands. There is already plenty of roaded county for folks who prefer to or cannot walk, and many roadless areas have existing useable routes into them as well. Our forefathers fought hard for every American's right to have access to public lands where fish and game were plentiful and managed to stay that way in perpetuity. I don't know how the NRA thinks it can get away with supporting such a blatant anti hunter piece of legislation in the name of hunter's rights. The RMEF originally came out in support of the bill but has since reversed it's position after careful review of the science and a bit of an uproar from it's members. As an NRA member and dedicated hunter, I urge the NRA to do the same.

From M Clark on Friday, August 19, 2011 12:38 PM
The NRA just lost some members over this bill. The NRA's anti-wilderness stance is quite surprising. Roads don't belong in wilderness areas. This press release has so many holes it that it almost seems like a twisted piece of anti-hunting prose. Like this: "The protectionist management by the two agencies severely restricts hunter access by 1.) Failing to authorize roads and trails that would help disabled and elderly hunters’ access hunting areas" It's wilderness. It's not Disneyland. Shall we install hand rails and escalators on Mt. Everest? This might sound tough, but the wilderness is not handicap accessible. As it should be. "2.) Prohibiting or limiting hunters from using carts for game retrieval and; 3.) Making areas virtually inaccessible due to the closure of existing roads and trails." What bunch of baby talk. The wilderness is too tough for me to pack out a deer. The NRA is catering to the sissy, pansy hunter. John Muir, Theodore Roosevelt and Aldo Leopold are rolling over in their graves. NRA: Whaaaaa. Hiking is too hard. I want a road for my ATV! "Studies have shown that a lack of access to hunting lands is one of the biggest reasons why people stop hunting." That's right, but it's about the privatization of game habitat, and nothing to do about wilderness areas.

From Vernor on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:11 PM
Less ATVs and more roadless areas only leads to better hunting. If those lard butts who can't walk would get up and go hiking they'd last a lot longer without bypass operations.

From somsai on Monday, August 01, 2011 8:32 AM
Name:*
Email:
Comments:*
Enter the above code here:
(Code is case insensitive. You can put lower or upper case.)
Can't read? Try different words.
 
 
Become an Instructor