Wisconsin DNR Pulls 16-Day Deer Hunt Proposal

By Justin McDaniel Published: 12/9/2009

Buck_(WI_DNR_Photo).jpg

After announcing Nov. 24 that it intended to submit a deer season framework to the Natural Resources Board that would include a 16-day gun deer season beginning in 2010, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has decided to pull that proposal from the board’s December agenda.

After a lower-than-expected deer harvest this season, which saw hunters register 195,647 deer, the lowest total since 1982 and a 29 percent drop from 2008, DNR Secretary Matt Frank informed the Natural Resources Board last Friday that the 16-day season proposal was being shelved to offer more time to review the results of the 2009 hunt.

Currently, Wisconsin has a nine-day gun deer season that begins the Saturday before Thanksgiving.

The full text of Frank’s letter to the board can be read below.

December 4, 2009

Christine Thomas, Chair
Natural Resources Board

Dear Chair Thomas and Natural Resource Board Members,

The Department has decided to remove the 16-day deer season proposal as an agenda item at the Natural Resources Board meeting next week. Given the preliminary harvest numbers for the 2009 nine-day hunt that the Department released earlier this week, we believe it is appropriate to postpone consideration of alternative herd control measures.

As we make important decisions about the best mix of policies to control the deer herd where it is over population goals and recover the herd where it is under population goals, I would like to give our staff more time to gather all the data from this season’s hunt and analyze it. This data is a critical component in the population models we use to estimate the size of the herd both regionally and statewide.

While we believe that a 16-day season remains a viable option for future consideration, removing this item from the Board’s December agenda makes it likely that there will not be sufficient time to implement it for the 2010 deer hunting season. The extra time we take now to carefully review this season’s deer harvest will be time well spent and will provide a better foundation for future herd management decision for the 2010 season and beyond.

Our 2009 pre-season forecasts anticipated a lower harvest. Preliminary harvest numbers from the just-completed nine-day gun hunt indicate a significant drop in harvest on the heels of 2008’s decline. We know that the herd is smaller in some areas, which is why we took action for the 2009 season. During this season, 13 deer management units had no bonus antlerless permits in order to restore the herd in those areas. 38 units were moved out of herd control to regular season, and we moved 29 units out of Earn-a-Buck, which contributed to a substantial decline in antlerless harvest. In all, the number of regular units increased from 21 in 2008 to 59 in 2009.

We will look carefully at the data to determine where we now stand with respect to the size of the deer population, which varies by region across the state. Preliminary numbers show a decline in buck harvest across the state. Hunters have reported seeing fewer deer on the landscape, and in some areas, a significant decline. For example, in the north and northeast, there are significant areas where the deer population is below goal. On the other hand, in the CWD zone in the southern part of the state, over-population has been a contributing factor to the increased prevalence of CWD in the deer herd, increasing the risk of spread. A full analysis of the 2009 harvest data will give us a better understanding of the size of the deer population as we make decisions for the 2010 hunt and future seasons.

At the Board’s meeting next week we still intend to present our regular report on the fall deer hunt, which will include preliminary harvest numbers, what hunters have been reporting and seeing, license sales, enforcement issues and other areas that we usually cover.

The 16-day proposal was developed from a process launched last April in response to widespread hunter concerns about Earn-a-Buck. The Board created a stakeholder committee that included strong representation from hunting organizations to consider effective alternatives to earn-a-buck. The Department went out for public comment this fall. We sincerely appreciate the hard work from staff and hunting organizations as well as widespread comment we received from hunters and the public.

The Department will continue to strive for the best deer hunting in the nation with a healthy, sustainable deer herd in balance with its habitat, including keeping crop and forest damage attributable to deer browsing at tolerable levels. We look forward to working with the Board, the Legislature, hunters, farmers, forest owners and the public over the months to come.

Sincerely,

Matt Frank
Secretary

Related Articles
Comments
I am a 20-year-old avid Wisconsin hunter. As such, I was very surprised to see that the 16-day gun deer season was even being considered. My family hunts in Florence County in upper Wisconsin. For the past 5 to 7 years we have noticed an enormous decrease in the deer population as a result of wolves, beers and harsh winters. I was happy to see that this year no doe tags were issued, but at the same time I am very upset with how the Wisconsin DNR has handle the deer population. This decrease in the population is a direct effect of the DNR issuing the same number of doe tags without considering how many deer are taken due to increases wolf and bear populations. Out of a camp which had 12 hunters sit from 30 to 70 hours, we did not harvest a single deer. My father and uncle, who sit all day everyday of the gun season, saw a combined 9 deer. I am very saddened by this, as this decrease will have a great affect on future generations. How are hunters throughout Wisconsin supposed to get children interested in the sport of hunting? Without some change in the DNR agenda, I feel as though the sheer number of hunters will decrease significantly over the next couple of years, which is to me very sad.

From Ben Meyers on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:02 PM
As an owner of 300 acres of land in SE Wisconsin (in a CWD zone), I can personally attest to the fact that the deer population is in a state of significant decline. Any suggestion that the deer population in SE Wisconsin is in a state of over-population is absolutely absurd! This sentiment is echoed by countless numbers of people that I have talked to from this part of the state. Where I used to see multiple groupings of deer as recently as 2-3 years ago, I now only see single, and occasionally pairs of deer with a marked reduction in the doe population. I sense a growing outrage among the hunting community regarding the absolute mismanagement of the Wisconsin deer herd at the hands of the DNR under the supposed threat of CWD. Members of our state legislation are also speaking out against these gross, negligent policies. The time has come for the public to rise up in support of a radical change in these policies through attendance and participation in the public DNR hearings. It is apparent that the current strategy is grossly inadequate and must be changed. I urge all who feel similarly to actively intervene to affect a radical change!

From tom stauss on Monday, December 14, 2009 10:24 PM
Name:*
Email:
Comments:*
Enter the above code here:
(Code is case insensitive. You can put lower or upper case.)
Can't read? Try different words.
 
 
Become an Instructor